Prediction of Tayisiya Morderger [894th] vs Francesca Curmi [375th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L L L L L W
Form
W L W W W W W L W LHead To Head: Morderger 1 - 1 Curmi
They have played 4 sets in total, with Morderger winning 2 and Curmi winning 2. The last match between Morderger and Curmi was at the W50 Macon, 23-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Francesca Curmi getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tayisiya Morderger | 1 |
| Francesca Curmi | 1 |
| Morderger | Stats | Curmi |
|---|---|---|
| 13% (1-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (12-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 894 | Ranking | 375 |
| 400 | Highest Rank | 299 |
| 28 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 3 |
| 57% (347-266) | Career Total W/L | 62% (169-104) |
| $2,075 | Career Prize Money | $4,274 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats 
Francesca Curmi
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Tayisiya Morderger
Player
Francesca Curmi
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 23 | Games Won | 17 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:42:41 | Average Match Time | 1:42:41 |
| 59% (80/135) | 1st Serve % | 68% (88/129) |
| 70% (56/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (54/88) |
| 47% (26/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (16/41) |
| 57% (8/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 46% (59/129) | Return Points Win % | 39% (53/135) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tayisiya Morderger vs Francesca Curmi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Morderger 1 - 1 Curmi
Editorial Prediction:
🎾 **Second Servings of Second Serves?!** 🍰
Imagine you’re at a buffet, but all they serve is second-serves; well, in the past half-year, Morderger's been taking 43.33% of those serves and turning them into points, while Curmi's been slightly greedier with 46.35%. In the tennis world, this buffet comparison is tightly linked to match prediction spot-on-ness.
😂 **Return of the ‘Serve’ King:** 🎬
Flip the script to return stats, and you'll find Morderger gobbling up 56.64% of opponents' second serves like they're hotcakes – Curmi, with 55.81%, is no slouch either. When it comes to first serve returns, though, Morderger only booked the table 30.55% of the time, while Curmi breezed through with 41.13%. Determining favorites? It's the secret sauce every tennis enthusiast craves.
🏆 **Breakin’ Under Pressure (Or Not):** 😅
Brace yourselves for the intense drama of breakpoints! Recently, Morderger's been a bit of a netscapologist, salvaging 50.98% of breakpoints, whereas Curmi's been more like a magician, disappearing 57.07% of them. If you’re the betting type, these breakpoint banishings are pure gold.
🌍 **Greatest Hits and Misses:** 🥊
Let's take a trip down memory lane to figure out who's more victorious. Over the last year, Morderger's match win rate sat at a modest 43.18% (W/L 19/25), while Curmi strutted along at 51.16% (W/L 22/21). Not quite the Fab Five, but hey, it’s a head-to-head head-scratcher.
🎾 **Clay Pigeons and Hard Roads:** 🚴♂️
Morderger’s surfing on clay more than hanging ten with a 57% win rate, but iron-hard surfaces leave them slightly frazzled at 47%. Meanwhile, Curmi’s cruising on hard surfaces at a breezy 68%, wobbling a tad on the I.hard, matching them to a 53% win rate – who knew surfaces could pick favorites?
📊 **Ranked Enthrallment:** 📅
Break out the spreadsheets! The past year saw Morderger face foes with an average rank of 354.36 as opposed to Curmi's battles with those ranked at 303.4. Whether you’re betting or just spreadsheet-gazing, averages sometimes pencil in more than luck. Smells like stats, eh?
🤯 **One-On-One with History and Deciders:** ⏳
Head-to-head, Morderger's polished off Curmi in their lone past meeting, a 6-1, 6-2 serving that left everyone’s jaws practically in the net. Push comes to shove; there’s been zero tiebreaks or deciding sets between them (commence scoreboard yawn). But venture elsewhere and Curmi's got a 56% deciding-set-deal, Morderger hanging at 38%.
🎲 **Break a Leg or Break a Serve:** 🎱
When opportunity knocks slap-bang onto the court, Morderger converts 47.32% of those precious breakpoints. Yet Curmi edges ahead slightly, punching through 50.83% like a point-stacking star. Breakpoint banter is what's predicting dreams are made of.
Tayisiya Morderger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tayisiya Morderger
Player
Denisa Hindova
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
77)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
48%
(
22 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aneta Laboutkova
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
6
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tayisiya Morderger
Player
Anna Gabric
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Francesca Curmi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Francesca Curmi
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Cagla Buyukakcay
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Francesca Curmi
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Sofia Costoulas
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Haruka Kaji
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Mallaurie Noel
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Conny Perrin
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pieri
Player
Francesca Curmi
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
43%
(
13 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
53%
(
24 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42
Total Points Won
38
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Sara Milanese
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (347/266) | Win/Loss | 62% (169/104) |
| 56% (767/592) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (377/253) |
| 54% (6524/5620) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (3177/2615) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 606 | Aces Total | 89 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1326 | Total Double Faults | 460 |
| 1:1:5 | Average Match Time | 1:24:47 |
| 562.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 429.23 |
| 55% (13722/24777) | 1st Serve % | 72% (10629/14787) |
| 63% (8644/13722) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (6165/10629) |
| 44% (4908/11055) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1867/4158) |
| 51% (1572/3093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1010/2006) |
| 47% (11330/24153) | Return Points Win % | 48% (7218/15072) |
| 57% (343/607) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (167/270) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 52% (57/110) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (25/48) |
| 45% (62/139) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (43/83) |
| 87% (362/316) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (165/142) |
| 12% (362/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (165/23) |
| 12% (251/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (108/26) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
